May 23, 2009
May 22, 2008
Economic Thought in Early Modern Japan
June 26-27, 2009
Venue: Bonhoeffer Room in the Union Theological Seminary
Sponsored by the University Seminar on Modern Japan at Columbia University
The papers will be pre-circulated in order to allow maximum discussion.
Friday, June 26: 1 PM – 5 PM
ETHAN SEGAL (Harvard University). “Money and the State: Medieval Precursors of the Early Modern Economy”
(Discussant: Ronald Frank, Pace University)
YAJIMA MICHIFUMI (Kantō Gakuin, Japan). “‘Mercantilism’ in Early Modern Japan: Trade and agricultural policy under the national isolation
(Discussant: Robert Horres, Tübingen University)
JAN SYKORA (Charles University, Prague). “Economic thought of Shōji Kōki and the Tempō Reforms in Saga Domain”
(Discussant: Mark Metzler, UT Austin)
GREGORY SMITS (Pennsylvania State University). “Guiding Horses Using Rotten Reins: Economic Thought in the Eighteenth-century Kingdom of Ryukyu”
(Discussant: David Howell, Princeton)
Saturday, June 27: 9 AM – 12:30 PM
KAWAGUCHI HIROSHI (Waseda University). “Economic Thought Concerning Freedom and Control”
(Discussant: Gregory Smits, Penn State)
OCHIAI KŌ (Hiroshima Shūdō University). “The shift to domestic sugar production and the ideology of ‘national interest’”
(Discussant: Jan Sykora, Charles University)
BETTINA GRAMLICH-OKA (Columbia University). “A Domain Doctor and Shogunal Politics”
(Discussant: David Howell, Princeton)
12:30 PM – 2 PM LUNCH
2:00 PM – 5 PM
ISHII SUMIYO (Keiō University, Japan). “Economic thought as a basis of economic activities: a case study of a local entrepreneur in the Meiji era”
(Discussant: Robert Horres, Tübingen University)
MARK RAVINA (Emory University). “Confucian banking: the community granary (shasō) in rhetoric and practice”
(Discussant: Gregory Smits, Penn State)
MARK METZLER (University of Texas, Austin): “Policy Fields, Polarities, and Regimes”
(Discussant: Bettina Gramlich-Oka, Columbia)
ETHAN SEGAL (Harvard University)
“Money and the State:Medieval Precursors of the Early Modern Economy”
YAJIMA MICHIFUMI (Kantō Gakuin, Japan)
Work by recent scholars of early modern Europe, including Vine and Magnuson, has suggested a model in which concern with the universal problems faced by early modern nations, mainly the drive to increase national (military) power and national wealth, led to a variety of different political measures in England, France, and Germany. If it is possible to apply “mercantilism” in Europe to a variety of individual paths, then its application to early modern Japan becomes possible as well, even considering unique aspects of Japan’s foreign policy, such as the national isolation system. If one of the premises of mercantilism (broadly defined) is the pursuit of wealth, then we can see that Japan’s bakuhan polity, too, shared this notion of gaining "national wealth" and prosperity for the country.
This paper will discuss the characteristics of what might be termed “Japanese mercantilism”. On the one hand, "Japanese mercantilism" was shaped around the political thought of foreign trade policies similar to the Western model; on the other, practical policies towards the pursuit of national wealth relied on agricultural production and administration, which allowed self-sufficiency in terms of food and thus made the "national isolation system" possible. In other words, "Japanese mercantilism" had an agricultural character, and its interaction with the seclusion policy meant that it did not include elements of militarization or colonization.
JAN SYKORA (Charles University, Prague)
GREGORY SMITS (Pennsylvania State University)
“Guiding Horses Using Rotten Reins: Economic Thought in the Eighteenth-century Kingdom of Ryukyu.”
Ryukyu can serve an excellent point of comparison in a volume on Tokugawa-era Japanese intellectual thought. Although the island kingdom was not formally part of Japan, it was under the domination of Satsuma at this time. Ryukyu also maintained direct ties to China. Intellectually, the kingdom was open to prevailing currents of Chinese and Japanese thought. In the political and economic realms, Ryukyu's situation was often precarious, which was conducive to economic thought grounded in concrete problems and experience. Although kinsei Ryukyu was home to many intellectual and literary figures, the prominent economic theorist was Sai On (1682-1761), who was also the most powerful politician during the first half of the eighteenth century.
A Confucian scholar, Sai On's ultimate stated goal was to create a society conducive to bringing forth the best in each of its members, regardless of social station. Like a typical Confucian, Sai On's highest ideal was personal and social moral excellence. He realized, however, that a morally superior society could not exist without a firm economic base. This firm economic base depended on a government that intervened actively and intelligently in economic matters. Social complexity meant that the state should set broad goals, create infrastructure, provide valuable information, and utilize the profit motive to nudge people to adopt a longer-term vision of the future. For Sai On, the market was a powerful force that a skillfully governed state could guide but not control with a heavy hand. He likened the process of governing to guiding a galloping horse using rotten reins.
This paper examines Sai On's economic thought in the context of Ryukyuan society of the early eighteenth century. I take as my main focus a close reading of Sai On's essay Essentials of Governance 図治要伝, (Ch. Tuzhi yaozhuan, Jp. Toji yōden) to explain the main features of Sai On's economic thought, its relationship to the conditions of Ryukyuan society, and its intellectual context. I also compare Sai On's ideas with major trends in Japanese economic thought. For example, whereas some Japanese thinkers advocated reliance on merchant expertise for guiding economic policy, Sai On argued that, while commercial activity itself was of great value to society, only government officials were―or should be―positioned to act in the best interests of society as a whole and formulate policies accordingly. Naturally, to do their jobs effectively, government officials must study the technical details of key industries. Sai On himself spent months in the rugged mountains of northern Okinawa studying forestry techniques and other aspects of agricultural production.
KAWAGUCHI HIROSHI (Waseda University)
“Economic Thought Concerning Freedom and Control”
Throughout history, economic markets have existed as a function of both free circulation of goods and various forms of control over economic activity. In this sense, freedom and control always accompany each other. The manner in which people have conceived and negotiated relations between free circulation and control are specific to time and place. From the viewpoint of economic thought, this paper examines the interplay of freedom and control in early modern Japan. Representative examples of early modern Confucian and Buddhist thought indicate the emergence of a viewpoint that valued economic activity as a social good and understood all economic actors in society as an interconnected network.
OCHIAI KŌ (Hiroshima Shūdō University)
“The rise of domestic sugar production and the ideology of 'the national interest’”
Almost all sugar was imported from overseas in the early Tokugawa period, and little was produced domestically, with the partial exception of brown sugar in Satsuma province. Motivated by growing concerns about the declining supplies of gold and silver caused by the balance of overseas exports, several key shogunal reformers (including the eighth shogun Tokugawa Yoshimune and the tenth shogun’s grand chamberlain Tanuma Okitsugu) pushed for increased domestic sugar production. In the second half of the Tokugawa era (the first half of the 19th century), the level of domestic sugar production increased in south-western Honshu, Kyushu, and the Okinawa islands.
Not only did the domestic sugar policy influence the development of cash crops, but it also affected the ideas of the people and the form of government. Spread on a popular level by figures like the herbalist Tamaru Ransui and the village head Ikegami Torozaemon, the shift to domestic sugar production resulted in a growing tendency for farmers to pay tax in money from sugar sales, rather than in grain, which undermined the traditional feudal tax system. On both popular and governmental levels, domestic sugar production was conceived in terms of the concept of ‘national interest’ and linked to the need to increase national wealth; paradoxically, it thus both fell in line with one of the key ideologies underpinning the Tokugawa state, and also shook its feudal foundations.
BETTINA GRAMLICH-OKA (Columbia University)
“A Domain Doctor and Shogunal Politics”
In the fifth month of 1784, one of the most powerful men in the shogunate at the time, Tanuma Okitsugu 田沼意次 (1719–1788), took up a proposal called Akaezo fūsetsukō 赤蝦夷風説考 (Thoughts on Rumors about Kamchatka, 1781–1783). In the account, the author Kudō Heisuke 工藤平助 (1734–1800) advocates the development and colonization of Ezo 蝦夷 (today’s Hokkaido), which would indeed change the future of the northern frontier. The Sendai domain physician Kudō Heisuke expressed his economic thought further in another account, which deals with the foreign trade in Nagasaki, calling here for immediate reform. By examining Heisuke’s political and economic ideas of “national” political and economic boundaries as they are exposed in the proposals, the actors he shared them with and the associated political practices, I call attention to the particular site of the network in which shogunal policies during the Tanuma period were formed. This paper seeks to explore, albeit in a preliminary way, the question of what we can learn about shogunal policies and political economy and their ideological underpinnings from such brief encounters of otherwise undisclosed political decision making.. Thereby we can not only win a greater understanding but also obtain a more complex picture of the late Tokugawa period, in which continuation and changes of shogunal policies pursued in the 1780s were perpetuated in the following decades.
ISHII SUMIYO (Keiō University, Japan)
“Economic thought as a basis for economic activities: a case study of a local entrepreneur in the Meiji era”
Itō Yōzō (1864-1934) was born in Tōtōmi province, and adopted into the Itō family, a local land-owning family. His worldview involved an inseparable relationship between an individual and the network of human relationships that makes up society; as a primary goal, every individual must act to develop society. Yōzō put these ideas into concrete practice, viewing his economic activities as a means for developing home, region and nation; he devoted himself to the family business of agriculture and to regional businesses like railway enterprise, which promoted local economic growth. Yōzō provides an instructive example of an entrepreneur who was motivated by specific structures of social and economic thought, yielding a case study that illustrates one possible set of connections between economic theory and practice.
MARK RAVINA (Emory University)
“Confucian banking:the community granary (shasō) in rhetoric and practice”
MARK METZLER (University of Texas, Austin)
“Policy Fields, Polarities, and Regimes”
Flowery Tales: Ōe Taku, Outcasts and the Meaning of Meiji Japan's “Emancipatory Moment”
This paper will explore the background to the so-called "Emancipation Edict for Outcasts" (buraku kaihōrei) issued by Japan's Meiji government in 1871. It focuses on the role of Ōe Taku (1847-1921), the official who is generally credited with having first proposed the Edict, but also delves into the social history of one particular outcast community on the outskirts of the newly opened treaty port of Kobe, which Ōe later claimed inspired his interest in the issue. At a thematic level, the paper considers how experiences and stories that carry localized meanings at one point in time come to be appropriated and woven into larger narratives of progress and nation in modern Japan."
"Gen'ichi Kato's Nobel Candidacy: Nerve Physiology and the Politics of Science, 1924-1937"
During the interwar period, Gen’ichi Kato (1890-1979) gained renown as one of the foremost nerve physiologists in the world for his isolation of single muscle and nerve fibers. This achievement, coming after many years of unsuccessful efforts by others, created a revolution in the specialty and gave medical science a far more precise understanding of the central nervous system than ever before. Nominated for the 1937 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine by Keio University associates, by a colleague from Argentina, and by the great Ivan Pavlov, Kato’s work received a highly favorable evaluation by the Nobel Committee’s designated referee. Nonetheless, Kato received no award on this occasion or any other. My presentation explores Kato’s brilliant, but complicated life. An early victim of vicious attacks by a former mentor and academic rival, Kato was able to survive through the patronage of the famed microbiologist S. Kitasato. Along the way he cultivated relationships with prominent scientists in Europe and the United States. One cannot say exactly why his Nobel candidacy failed, but foreign scientists’ reactions to his aggressive personality, involvement by Japanese officials in the candidacy itself, and the usual distance – geographic, cultural, political – between Japan and Sweden were likely contributing factors.
Discussant: William Johnston (Wesleyan University)
Noriko Watanabe (Baruch)
Envisioning Identities: Language Policies and Naming Practice in Japan
In general, language policies are often motivated by ideologies of language that link language and linguistic features with social and cultural meanings. The particular governmental policy on character use in question is intended to promote public communication through clear and uncomplicated language by limiting the character set. However, this policy can conflict with private use of language, such as naming a new member of one’s family or community. Kanji’s graphic complexity and semantic potential provide rich resources for name-givers to create linguistic representation of individuality and identity. Disapproval of written forms by the government, therefore, means drawing a boundary on how name-givers can envision the individuality and identity of the new member of society.
Discussant: Patricia Welch (Hofstra)
Michael Como (Columbia)
Although it is commonly assumed that the introduction of the Buddhist tradition into the Japanese islands facilitated the transmission of continental medical practices and understandings of disease, there has been surprisingly little recognition of the degree to which fear of disease in turn shaped the agenda and status of the early Japanese Buddhist tradition. As the origins of disease were commonly understood in terms of malevolent spirits, it is perhaps not surprising that early Buddhist movements and institutions were frequently if not primarily concerned with the propitiation or pacification of hostile super-human entities that were believed to have the ability to bring plague and disaster across the realm. To paraphrase the old commercial, without the struggle against demons and disease, Japanese Buddhism as we know it would not have been possible.
This orientation produced a consistent bias within the Japanese islands for those forms of Buddhism that had most thoroughly absorbed non-Buddhist notions of healing and spirit-quelling that prevailed in China and on the Korean Peninsula. These in turn tended to be centered upon notions of yin and yang, purity and a class of astral deities that were believed to be responsible for the advent for many of the most pernicious ailments that afflicted the human race. Often they utilized texts that blended Indian astrological systems, which utilized divination and horoscopes to determine the fate of individuals based upon their distinctive relationship to astral figures at the time of their birth, with Chinese astrological techniques that were oriented towards understanding the fate of the ruler and the political health of the body politic.
In this paper I will suggest that to understand the early Japanese Buddhism we must therefore look beyond Buddhist scriptures and practices in two important ways. First, in terms of the content, we need to consider the role of what has come to be known as “the Way of Yin and Yang,” or onmyōdō, both within the Japanese Buddhist tradition and within broader cultural and technological spheres of the Japanese islands. In my understanding of this very broad term, I include all rites and legends associated Chinese medicine and astrology, as well as closely related rites of spirit quelling that were predicated upon the manipulation of yin and yang and the invocation of astral deities.
Equally importantly, however, we also need to consider the anthropological dimensions associated with the transmission of knowledge in ancient Japan. If, as seems likely, lineages served as the chief conduit through which knowledge was acquired, produced and transmitted within the Japanese islands, how did the flow of cults and rituals in ancient Japan relate to the transmission of technological knowledge? How was the Japanese Buddhist tradition shaped by lineages that were closely associated with healing rites and technologies? In this paper I will suggest that because lineage was inevitably tied up with issues of ancestry, rank and power, healer monks from a small coterie of lineages repeatedly reached the pinnacles of power in ancient Japan. Since power in turn produced intrigue, slander and retribution, this dynamic also helped produce a series of tragic, if highly interesting careers for some of the most notorious monks of the Nara period. By focusing on the careers of four such monks and paying attention to their lineal affiliations, I will suggest that we can gain new insights into some broader trends in the interactions between the early Japanese Buddhist tradition, onmyōdō and the fear of disease.
Joint Meeting with Brazil Seminar
Brazilian-Japanese Families Broken by Transnational Migration
During the last years of the 1920’s, a group of Japanese immigrants settled in a small colony, Bastos, in Sao Paulo State. Some of them came with their families, others came with made-up families in order to comply with Brazilian immigration laws and never saw their relatives again. After achieving success as small cotton farmers, the immigrants had to change to poultry farming due to the declining price of cotton. In the 1980’s due to the Brazilian economic crisis, Japanese-Brazilians, the immigrants’ children and grandchildren, began to migrate back to Japan. The aim of this research carried out from 2005 to 2006 is to understand the lives of the women and children who stayed in Brazil when the men in their family returned to Japan. We observe that these women and children were emotionally and sometimes financially harmed by separation. Children who were left behind stayed with their grandparents or with a live-in housemaid. Sometimes children are depressed and refuse to go to school. One child committed suicide; others increase their demands for clothing or toys from their faraway parents. Still others do not obey their grandparents, who are too old to understand their needs. The grandparents’ situation is not easy either. Sometime the parents do not send money to support their own children. The old Japanese-Brazilian generation which is in charge of the Japanese-Brazilian Association has been trying to help those who are left behind, but they do not have enough resources for that.